Hong, X (2002) A comparative study of contractor performance based on Japanese, UK and US construction practice. PhD thesis, University of Wolverhampton, UK.
Abstract
Globalisation of world economy requires that any robust benchmarking of contractor performance be conducted on an international level. The Japanese and US construction industries are internationally renowned as world leaders. Notwithstanding this, when at its best, UK construction has been shown to be excellent, and capable of matching any other construction industry in the world. A comparison of contractor performance and practices between the three countries can distinguish their respective strengths and weaknesses and provide an opportunity for contractors to learn from each other and improve their performance. However, comparing international construction is onerous because of the uniqueness of construction products and the complexity of the production process. Each of the existing methods developed for this purpose has its own limitations in terms of comparability and/or representativeness of data. Having undertaken an international review of contractor performance, the research has: a) defined 'best practice' for contractors and established criteria to evaluate contractor performance and practice in terms of construction cost, construction time, construction quality and sustainable development; b) developed a new research approach towards comparing international contractor performance based on a hypothetical construction project which maintains the comparability and representativeness of data; c) conducted a questionnaire survey among contractors in the three countries to collect information in regards to their performance and practices; d) identified the significant differences in contractor performance and practices between the three countries and revealed the possible causes for the disparities; e) developed six best practice performance models by means of multiple regression analysis. The thesis concluded that there exist significant differences in contractor performance and practice between Japan, the UK and the US. Based on the practices of contractors in the three countries, factors significantly influencing contractor performance are identified and measures for performance improvement are recommended for contractors.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | international; benchmarking; performance improvement; best practice; new comparison method; performance models; multiple regression analysis |
| Index terms: | sustainable development, Japan, production process, survey, multiple regression analysis, construction quality, benchmarking, construction product, complexity, construction project, questionnaire, globalization, construction cost, contractor performance, disparity, construction industry, construction time, best practice, performance improvement, comparative study, international construction |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, strategic management, business, research design and methodology, financial and cost management, economic analysis, production management, health safety and environment, Geography, contract management, manufacturing engineering, performance measurement, industry analysis, quality assurance, economic factors, statistical analysis, systems engineering, project controls, social justice |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Ethics, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Project Management, International Construction, Time Control, Contract Administration, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here