Distributed coordination of project schedule changes: An agent-based compensatory negotiation approach

Kim, K (2002) Distributed coordination of project schedule changes: An agent-based compensatory negotiation approach. PhD thesis, Stanford University, USA.

Abstract

In the construction industry, projects are becoming increasingly large and complex, involving multiple subcontractors. Traditional centralized coordination techniques used by the general contractors become insufficient as subcontractors perform most work and provide their own resources. When subcontractors cannot provide enough resources, they hinder their own performance as well as that of other subcontractors and ultimately the entire project. Thus, construction projects need a new distributed coordination approach wherein all of the concerned subcontractors can respond to changes and reschedule a project dynamically. The focus of this research is rescheduling a project in a distributed manner in order to lower the sum of all participating subcontractors' extra costs associated with changes in their resource constraints, subject to the precedence relationships among project activities, without assuming that a central coordinator knows all the information needed for coordination and that subcontractors are benevolent. The challenges are to find a new distributed approach that enables subcontractors to compensate other affected subcontractors for disadvantageous agreements so that it enhances the global outcome while pursuing individual incentives; to identify schedule conflicts, consider alternatives; and resolve schedule conflicts in a tightly coupled network of related activities; and to preserve the work logic and ensure convergence of distributed computation. To meet the challenges, I developed a new distributed coordination framework for project schedule changes (DCPSC) and a novel agent-based compensatory negotiation (ABCN) methodology to enable the framework. The DCPSC-based ABCN methodology has met challenges fully by using novel definitions of utility-based schedule-change options, by employing new multi-linked negotiation protocols based on a shared project plan, and by introducing new mechanisms of directing message-passing based on the Critical Path Method (CPM). In addition to this theoretical work, I designed and implemented a new Java-based multi-agent prototype—distributed subcontractor agent system (DSAS)—to demonstrate the effectiveness of the DCPSC framework through a series of comparison tests, charrette tests, and measurements. DSAS solves the problems successfully. Thus, this research formalizes, implements, and tests the necessary steps to help subcontractors coordinate schedule changes in order to increase the efficiency of their resource use, which in turn enhances successful completion of whole projects.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Paulson Jr., B C
Uncontrolled Keywords: coordination; effectiveness; efficiency; measurement; construction project; conflicts; critical path method; negotiation; scheduling; subcontractor
Index terms: computation, resource constraint, charrette, methodology, construction project, precedence relationship, subcontractor, critical path method, agent, scheduling, general contractor, prototype, effectiveness, negotiation, option, coordination, agreements, construction industry, becoming, efficiency
Subjects: modelling and simulation, operations research, operations management, contract formation, computational methods, practitioner, decision analysis, conflict resolution, industry analysis, philosophical process, performance management, research methods, management, design process, production management
Topics: Organizational Design, Contract Administration, Time Control, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Quality Management, Risk Management, Project Management, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here