Pekuri, A; Pekuri, L and Haapasalo, H (2013) The role of business models in Finnish construction companies. Construction Economics and Building, 13(3), pp. 13-23. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
Business models are seen as an essential part of successful businesses as they define the way companies create value for their customers and subsequently make profit from their operations. A good business model has a potential to separate a company from its competitors by creating a competitive advantage. The purpose of this research is to explore how managers understand and deploy the business model concept in construction. For this, eight experienced managers have been interviewed and their answers have been analysed using the theoretical aspects of business models as a reference. In the interviews, managers deployed business model concept very differently than what is accustomed in practice and in academia; they relate these models to different project delivery and contract structures or to companies' business segments rather than to analysing how their companies provide value for customers in the selected markets. The results of the interviews indicate that the managers in construction do neither understand the concept properly nor exploit any similar value creation analysis in their business. The interviewees had significant problems describing their companies' business models and value creation logic, pointing out the lack of analysis and understanding of customer values and needs in the project delivery process. This may be one of the overtones of the persistent client dissatisfaction in the construction industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | business development; business models; competitive advantage; strategy; value creation |
| Index terms: | manager, competitive advantage, interview, contract structure, academia, business model, value creation, construction industry, strategy, markets, project delivery, construction company, profit, business development |
| Subjects: | organization, business, management, economic development, data collection methods, practitioner, educational institutions, market analysis, economic analysis, project delivery, contractual arrangements, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Education, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Procurement, Business Strategy, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here