Paris, D E (2002) A residential satisfaction decision support system for affordable housing. PhD thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA.
Abstract
This research used neural networks to develop a decision support system, and model the relationship between one's living environment and residential satisfaction. Residential satisfaction was investigated at two affordable housing multifamily rental properties located in Atlanta, Georgia. This research used two approaches. The first approach examined the survey data collected from both properties, Defoors Ferry Manor and Moores Mill, separately. The second approach analyzed survey data by consolidating data from both sample populations into one data file. This research analyzed the surveyed data in both approaches using four techniques: frequency distributions, chi-square analysis, correlation analysis, and neural network analysis. In the first approach, the neural network accurately categorized ninety-eight percent of the cases in the training set and ninety-three percent of the cases in the validation test set. The second approach used two trials were used for the neural network. The first trial used one hundred, twenty-five rows to train the data, and the remaining fifty-three rows to validate the network; the neural network correctly categorized eighty-three percent of these cases. The second trial used one hundred, seventy-eight rows to train the data and the same data rows to validate the network; the neural network correctly categorized ninety-three percent of these cases. This research represents a first attempt to use neural networking to model the relationship between one's living environment and residential satisfaction.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Kangari, R |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | decision support; residential; affordable housing; training; Georgia; network analysis; population; frequency distribution; neural network |
| Index terms: | neural network, networking, survey, Georgia, decision support, population, validation, correlation analysis, frequency distribution, network analysis, affordable housing, residential satisfaction |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, construction type, artificial intelligence, data analysis and analytics, economic analysis, communication, Geography, professional development, statistical analysis, demography, decision analysis |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Risk Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Digital Applications, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here