Development of a construction productivity metrics system (CPMS)

Park, H-S (2002) Development of a construction productivity metrics system (CPMS). PhD thesis, University of Texas at Austin, USA.

Abstract

Construction productivity has been a cause of great concern in both theconstruction industry and academia. Even though many companies havedeveloped their own productivity tracking systems based on their experiences andprevious studies, none have been successful in establishing common definitionsand developing a survey tool that collects standard productivity data at theappropriate levels. This research was initiated to establish a common set ofconstruction productivity metrics and their corresponding definitions.As a result of this research effort, the Construction Productivity MetricsSystem (CPMS), which contains a list of direct and indirect accounts and 56 dataelements grouped into seven major categories, was developed. The CPMS is astandard construction productivity data collection tool and provides a frameworkto report industry norms to benchmark construction productivity.Input from 73 industry experts were used in determining the 56 measuringelements and their corresponding definitions. Data collected from the 16industrial projects were used in presenting preliminary findings and illustratingdata analysis and data presentation methodologies. The expected relationshipsfrom data were also provided to show the recommended outputs of futureresearch. Because of the small sample size, drawing any conclusions would bespeculative and thus they were kept to a minimum. Based on the analyses, thedeveloped CPMS is believed to be a reasonable productivity data collection toolto provide industry norms.This dissertation also introduces a new approach to estimate expectedconstruction productivity and explains the concept of developing a constructionproductivity model to calculate expected productivity. Finally, conclusions andrecommendations for further improvement are offered.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Tucker, R L and Thomas, S R
Uncontrolled Keywords: industry norms; productivity; sample size
Index terms: estimate, construction productivity, dissertation, academia, productivity, sample size, industry norm, methodology, survey, drawing
Subjects: research methods, management, educational institutions, business, research design and methodology, data collection methods, research dissemination and communication, financial and cost management, operations management, technical documentation
Topics: Education, Project Management, Design Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here