Shehab-Eldeen, T (2002) An automated system for detection, classification and rehabilitation of defects in sewer pipes. PhD thesis, Concordia University, Canada.
Abstract
The poor status of sewer pipes in North America has been reported by many researchers, revealing the presence of many defects that impact their performance. Inadequate inspection is considered as one of the main causes behind the declining condition of this class of pipes. This could be attributed to high cost of inspection and inadequate funds allocated to this purpose. The high cost is due to the current manual and high labor intensive inspection practice. Sewer rehabilitation methods are numerous and are constantly being developed. One of the rapidly expanding fields in the sewer rehabilitation industry is trenchless technology. Due to the large number of methods associated with this field, selecting the most suitable method manually can be a challenging task. Selection in this environment may also suffer from the limited knowledge and/or experience of the decision-maker. This research presents two developed automated systems: AUTO-DETECT and AUTO-SELECT. AUTO-DETECT detects and classifies defects in sewer pipes automatically. The system utilizes image analysis techniques, artificial intelligence (AI) and Visual Basic programming language for performing its task. A multiple classifier module encompassing a total of fifteen classifiers was developed to counter-check the results generated by the system. A solution strategy was also developed for efficient utilization of the developed specialized classifiers in an effort to improve the system's performance. The automated system was validated using actual data from randomly selected sections of the sewer network of a major Canadian municipality. The system's accuracy was found to range from 80% to 100%. AUTO-SELECT is essentially a multi-attribute decision support system designed to select and rank the most suitable trenchless rehabilitation methods for sewer pipes. The system utilizes two modules: (1) database management system (DBMS) and (2) decision support system (DSS). The developed relational database assists in identifying suitable trenchless rehabilitation techniques that satisfy a total of sixteen factors which account for technical, contractual and cost requirements of projects as well as user specified preferences. In case of having more than one suitable rehabilitation method, a DSS was developed to evaluate and rank them and, accordingly, suggest the most suitable one. A case example has been worked out to demonstrate the use and capabilities of the developed system.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Moselhi, O |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | accuracy; decision support; municipality; artificial intelligence; programming; rehabilitation |
| Index terms: | inspection, database, artificial intelligence, presence, module, accuracy, strategy, management system, decision support, relational database, sewer, municipality, preference, programming |
| Subjects: | programming, environmental science, artificial intelligence, professional development, management, architectural elements, decision-making and reasoning, infrastructure and transport systems, administrative law, quality assurance, data management, decision analysis |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Sustainability, Legal Issues, Quality Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Information Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here