Ibrahim, A D; Price, A D F and Dainty, A R J (2008) Is the local improvement finance trust (LIFT) procurement initiative delivering the expected economies of scale? Results from three case studies. In: Dainty, A (ed.) Proceedings of 24th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1-3 September 2008, Cardiff, UK.
Abstract
The UK Department of Health (DoH) introduced the Local Improvement Finance Trust (LIFT) initiative in 2000 to reverse the declining state of primary healthcare facilities. The initiative involves partnerships between diverse organisations from public and private sectors working together to deliver improvements in facilities that will be suitable for modern primary and social care services. However, recent evaluations of the performance of some schemes under the initiative show mixed results. This paper examines three LIFT case studies to investigate whether the LIFT procurement strategy supports the delivery of facilities for improved primary and social care services that meet local needs whilst providing value for money. The investigations, which involved senior managers, revealed significant differences in the maturity levels of the schemes evaluated in terms of appropriate systems, processes and structures in the planning and implementation of the schemes. Although there is potential for more improvements, the pattern of progress made generally confirmed an evolving system, with considerable evidence of performance improvement from project-to-project. Whilst suggesting some potential ways for securing long-term improvements and sustained value for money, this paper concludes that there is considerable evidence that the LIFT initiative is delivering the expected economies of scale in providing modern facilities for the provision of integrated primary and social care services.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | economies of scale; primary care; procurement; value for money |
| Index terms: | value-for-money, implementation, evidence, social care, investigation, performance improvement, procurement strategy, private sector, partnership, case study, maturity level, manager |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, practitioner, contractual arrangements, performance measurement, evaluation, sociology, partnership management, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Value Management, Quality Management, Urban Studies, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here