Quantifying the uncertainty associated with long-term maintenance contracts

Kostuk, K J (2003) Quantifying the uncertainty associated with long-term maintenance contracts. PhD thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Canada.

Abstract

Long term maintenance contracts are emerging as an alternative for state agencies to manage their infrastructure assets. For the owner, long term maintenance contracts establish a deterministic schedule for maintenance costs over a fixed time horizon. It has been documented that contractors are willing to accept the risks associated with long term maintenance contracts when provided with the information necessary to assess the potential risk and the freedom to provide innovative solutions to address these risks. The objective of this research was to develop a generic framework to quantify the financial risk faced by a contractor in bidding a long term maintenance contract for public sector infrastructure. To accomplish this goal, a methodology was developed to take generic infrastructure asset performance curves, maintenance treatment costs, and minimum performance criteria as inputs to calculate the present value of the expected maintenance costs for a long term maintenance contract. The probability distribution associated with these predicted costs can then be applied by a contractor (in conjunction with their risk tolerance) to establish the appropriate tender price. By adjusting the input parameters, the contractor can determine the sensitivity of the optimal maintenance strategy to model inputs. The sensitivity analysis allows the contractor to determine the inputs that must be controlled to ensure success as well as to identify the areas which could potentially provide the greatest opportunity for savings. The framework developed in this research is a generic mathematical methodology, applicable to all forms of public sector infrastructure. To illustrate its application, a roadway pavement management problem was selected. The methodology to accomplish the research objective was quite straight forward. The first step in the process was to generate transition probabilities from infrastructure asset performance curves. These transition probabilities provided a mathematical representation of asset deterioration and the effects of maintenance and rehabilitation activities throughout the term of the contract. From the transition probabilities, an optimal maintenance strategy was determined. The optimal maintenance strategy was modelled over a ten year time horizon (the typical length of a long term maintenance contract). From the ten year model, expected costs, variance, and in turn the risk associated with a project (individual maintenance segments in a contract) were determined. The sum of the expected project costs is equal to the expected total cost of the long term maintenance contract.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Sparks, G A
Uncontrolled Keywords: uncertainty; pavement; bidding; deterioration; public sector; rehabilitation; owner; probability; maintenance contract; project cost
Index terms: owner, probability distribution, savings, public sector, variance, maintenance cost, strategy, tender price, project cost, deterioration, performance criteria, maintenance contract, sensitivity analysis, agency, bidding, methodology
Subjects: measurement and scaling, sociology, administrative law, statistical analysis, environmental hazards, performance measurement, management, financial management, tendering, economics, maintenance engineering, research methods, bidding, economic analysis, material degradation and durability
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Procurement, Sustainability, Legal Issues, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here