Lee, S-H (2003) A process model for controlling project productivity of highway construction operations. PhD thesis, University of Florida, USA.
Abstract
Productivity studies in the highway construction industry have been few and far between, even though many research studies on the subject have been conducted in the construction industry. This research has therefore focused on developing a suitable approach for studying productivity on highway construction projects. The researcher reviewed existing models developed for productivity studies to examine whether or not they were appropriate to measure productivity of highway construction operations. Some principles of the models were useful, but none of the principles was applied to measure overall productivity at the project level. They were used only to monitor productivity for just one or two types of work items. However, productivity should be measured not separately but as a whole in order to understand the entire project performance. Therefore, in this research, a process model was developed for measuring and controlling project productivity of highway construction operations. This process model consisted of three basic steps. The objective of the first step was to collect construction field data. The first step included the processes for estimating quantities according to the list of contract pay items, measuring man-hours, and recording considerable disruptive events. The objective of the second step was to establish a qualitative and a quantitative database with the collected data. The second step provided the processes for unifying daily work quantities into a single value, estimating project productivity, and identifying considerable disruptive events. The objective of the third step was to analyze the databases for the purpose of controlling project productivity. The third step involved the processes for analyzing the variation of daily project productivity, quantifying the inefficiency of the input factor, and detecting the sources causing the loss of project productivity. The process model was validated through three case studies. The three basic steps of the process model were applied on three actual highway construction projects awarded by the Florida Department of Transportation. All these projects had a similar scope of work in terms of their construction type and size, but they were located in different classified areas. Two of them were categorized as “urban projects” and the third one was classified as a “rural project. ” This research evaluated the result of the application as being a success.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Ellis, R D |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | efficiency; construction project; highway; estimating; productivity; project performance; case studies |
| Index terms: | productivity, database, efficiency, case study, construction industry, highway construction, project performance, estimating, variation, construction project |
| Subjects: | management, performance management, civil engineering, contractual condition, production management, project management theory and practice, data management, industry analysis, data collection methods, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Digital Applications, Contract Administration, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here