Ng, F P (2003) Quantity and pricing decisions in the presence of advance contracts. PhD thesis, Stanford University, USA.
Abstract
Up to this point, most research in the field of supply chain management has been focused on the optimal inventory and release policy in the presence of advance information. The purpose of this dissertation is to investigate the quantity and pricing decisions of both suppliers and manufacturers when advance contracts are available in addition to spot contracts. In order to quantify these decisions, I need a pricing model for products that have both private and market risks. This dissertation proposes a new way of deriving the correlation pricing formula to price assets that are indirectly linked to market assets. This pricing formula provides the theoretical foundation for the existence and uniqueness of risk-neutral probabilities and is shown to have a smaller variance than a regular time series model. Another contribution is a novel way to find the optimal mixture of advance and spot production from the supplier's point of view and the optimal order policy from the manufacturer's point of view. Other researchers have studied using price discounts as incentives to secure advance orders. This dissertation includes both discounts and price caps and proposes a model to capture the cost savings when the proportion of advance orders changes. The last contribution of this dissertation is two computational models that are risk-preference indifferent. Both Monte Carlo simulation in a risk-neutral setting and double lattices are applied to evaluate a price-capped multi-period advance contract.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Chiu, S S and Bjornsson, H C |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | market; inventory; policy; pricing; supply chain management; time series; Monte Carlo simulation; simulation; supplier |
| Index terms: | cost saving, dissertation, presence, Monte Carlo simulation, pricing, inventory, variance, preference, computational model, manufacturer, time series |
| Subjects: | measurement and scaling, economics, decision-making and reasoning, inventory management, modelling and simulation, environmental science, data science, economic analysis, research dissemination and communication, practitioner |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Supply Chain Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here