Panopoulos, G D (2003) Economic aspects of safety in the Greek construction industry. PhD thesis, Aston University, UK.
Abstract
The thesis addresses the economic impacts of construction safety in Greece. The research involved the development of a methodology for determining the overall costs of safety, namely the sum of the costs of accidents and the costs of safety management failures (with or without accident) including image cost. Hitherto, very little work has been published on the cost of accidents in practical case studies. Moreover, to the author?s belief, no research has been published that seeks to determine in real cases the costs of prevention. The methodology developed is new, transparent, and capable of being replicated and adapted to other employment sectors and to other countries. The methodology was applied to three construction projects in Greece to test the safety costing methodology and to offer some preliminary evidence on the business case for safety. The survey work took place between 1999 and 2001 and involved 27 months of costing work on site. The study focuses on the overall costs of safety that apply to the main (principal) contractor. The methodology is supported by 120 discrete cost categories, and systematic criteria for determining which costs are included (counted) in the overall cost of safety. A quality ... (continues)
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | prevention, construction industry, costing, case study, employment, economic impact, evidence, methodology, construction project, business case, construction safety, costs of safety, survey, Greece |
| Subjects: | strategic project management, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, industry analysis, environmental health, financial analysis, management, research methods, accounting and finance, production management, health safety and environment, Geography, financial risk |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Project Management, Geographical Context, Sustainability, Human Resources, Cost Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here