An examination of the procurement of insurance-funded repairs to privately owned dwellings

Tew, A D (2003) An examination of the procurement of insurance-funded repairs to privately owned dwellings. PhD thesis, Loughborough University, UK.

Abstract

This thesis identifies an area of construction that is under-researched from both the construction and insurance perspectives. This an industry sector that remains unrecognised as a potential source of new business that is capable of producing a continuity of work consistently over time, possibly in perpetuity. The sector remains unattractive partially through a failure to realise that the work volumes are significant in the terms of both job frequency and total annual spend. An annual spend that is unrecognised as contributing approximately 10% of all private work undertaken within the small works industry. This research therefore undertakes an investigation to identify and understand the unique and novel characteristics exhibited by this sector that set it apart from other forms of construction activity.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: failure; insurance; small works
Index terms: repair, industry sector, investigation, insurance, construction activity
Subjects: economic analysis, construction operations, data collection methods, industry analysis, maintenance engineering
Topics: Research Practice, Business Strategy, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here