Trill, J E (2003) The application of occupational performance standards in the construction industry: 'Factors influencing their use'. PhD thesis, University of Sussex, UK.
Abstract
This thesis identifies and illuminates key construction industry issues that affect the design and implementation of Human Resource Development (HRD) schemes, based on the application of workplace performance evidence. It focuses on National Vocational Qualifications (NVQs) for construction site supervisors, site managers, technical services practitioners and contracts managers; together with a professional development programme (PDP) for construction graduates which is designed to satisfy the professional practice requirements of the Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB). The study identifies key features of the economic, social and business environments in which construction vocational education and training takes place; and uses four case studies to identify implementation issues and the strategies used to design and implement the NVQs and the PDP. Material for the case studies is largely derived from participant observation by the author who variously took part in the development of the NVQs and PDP either as a Member of the CIOB or as a training and development consultant. Findings show the high degree of commitment and involvement needed by each employer seeking to provide and support workplace development opportunities. As a consequence, the thesis portrays the limitations of the workplace as a major resource for providing nationally recognised and accredited vocational qualifications. Workplaces and employer workplace support generally are not accessible to unemployed, contracted or part-time practitioners; and there are difficulties in reconciling each employer's work practices with those necessary for the acquisition of an NVQ. Each case study identifies some common implementation issues and also some, which are specific to the circumstances of those with an interest in the particular scheme (NVQ or PDP). The thesis concludes that the Government top-down policies and implementation strategies for NVQs do not adequately take account of the circumstances of the stakeholders and contrasts them with the more inclusive and successful policies and implementation strategies adopted by the CIOB when developing the Site Management NVQ and the PDP. The thesis underlines the ways by which the CIOB was able to use well established employer and practitioner networks and consultation procedures in the implementation processes. It suggests that professional bodies might be encouraged to take a more leading and proactive role in the implementation of future national vocational education and training developments.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction site; education; government; site management; training; construction site supervisor; consultant; contracts manager; graduate; professional; stakeholders; vocation; case study; participant observation |
| Index terms: | qualification, professional development, case study, acquisition, vocation, site management, site manager, vocational education and training, implementation, construction site supervisor, construction industry, contracts manager, observation, programme, construction site, strategy, commitment, evidence, practitioner, work practice, human resource, professional practice |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, business, specialized education, practitioner, psychology, work location, contractual arrangements, construction operations, management, educational resources, professional development, project controls, industry analysis, student development |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Information Management, Roles and Professions, Human Resources, Site Management, Organizational Design, Time Control, Procurement, Education |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here