Examination of the correlation of critical success and delay factors in construction projects in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Alkhathami, M M (2004) Examination of the correlation of critical success and delay factors in construction projects in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia. PhD thesis, University of Pittsburgh, USA.

Abstract

The goal of all parties involved in a construction project—owners, contractors, or consultants, in either the private or public sector—is to successfully complete it on schedule, within a planned budget, with the highest quality, and in the safest manner. Construction projects are frequently influenced by either success factors that help project parties reach their goal as planned, or delay factors, that stifle or postpone project completion. Accurately identifying success and delay factors can help project parties reach their intended goals with greater efficiency. This study extracted seven of the most important success and delay factors according to the literature (14 total success and delay factors), and then examined correlations between them to determine which were the most influential in preventing project delays. Two surveys were distributed throughout the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The first examined how project owners and contractors that collaborated on the same project perceived success and delay factors, while the second examined the perceptions of engineers in general. Data was collected and evaluated by statistical methods to measure the strength and direction of the relationship between critical success and delay factors, to examine owners' and contractors' evaluations of projects' critical success and delay factors, and to evaluate the influence of critical success factors on critical delay factors. Additionally, one and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) has been used to examine how the group or groups evaluated the influence of the critical success factors in avoiding or preventing each of the delay factors, and which success factors were perceived as most influential in avoiding or preventing critical delay factors. The research found that sound organization planning efforts and a competent and experienced project manager helped to avoid many critical delay factors, while adherence to safety precautions and procedures and a project team's motivation and goal orientation were the least influential among the seven success factors.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Ries, R J
Uncontrolled Keywords: efficiency; motivation; project team; construction project; safety; consultant; owner; project manager; Saudi Arabia; critical success factor
Index terms: project team, statistical method, public sector, engineer, owner, Saudi Arabia, project manager, efficiency, variance, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, project delay, critical success factor, construction project, survey, success factor, motivation, project party
Subjects: production management, Geography, performance management, administrative law, statistical analysis, project controls, measurement and scaling, sociology, control systems, data collection methods, profession, project delivery, health monitoring assessment and metrics, psychology
Topics: Health and Safety, Project Management, Geographical Context, Legal Issues, Quality Management, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Time Control, Human Resources
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here