Auchterlounie, A C (2004) A new quality theory for UK private housebuilding based on definable quality principles, impression management and the control of cognitive dissonance. PhD thesis, Heriot-Watt University, UK.
Abstract
This is an investigation into the concept of quality and how it relates to the private housebuilding industry. The aim of which was to find out why the house buying public were not getting the level of quality and thus end product they wanted. It considers the classic quality theories; how they are applied to the manufacturing industries, service industries and the commercial construction industry and their lack of transferability to the private housebuilding industry. The research considers the measurement and management of quality, and how strategies such as Total Quality Management have equated quality to conformance to customer requirements and therefore customer satisfaction. The research employs both qualitative and quantitative methods, using a combination of questionnaires and semi-structured interviews for data collection. Case studies are then used to analyse the current approaches to quality from a leading private housebuilding company, comparing this with what has been achieved by a leading company in the commercial sector and the quality approach used by a pioneering American housebuilder. As the research progressed it gave rise to several conceptual models of the quality process, these models help to explain why quality has not always been achieved using these quality systems. Combining the disciplines of quality management and applied psychology and based on quality concepts from other sectors and their analysis the research has combined them to produce a new quality theory and model for the UK housebuilding industry. The theory and model are distinctive by addressing the principles of Cognitive Dissonance and incorporating Impression Management to improve the representational accuracy of definable quality achieved in customer satisfaction surveys.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | psychology; accuracy; building industry; commercial; housebuilding; manufacturing; quality management; total quality management; builder; housebuilder; case studies; interview |
| Index terms: | psychology, quantitative method, questionnaire, builder, accuracy, survey, manufacturing industry, strategy, interview, total quality management, housebuilding, quality management, investigation, customer satisfaction, building industry, housebuilder, commercial construction, case study |
| Subjects: | management, construction integration, service delivery, professional development, industry analysis, quality assurance, behavioral psychology, data collection methods, construction type, practitioner, data analysis and analytics, evaluation methods |
| Topics: | Information Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here