Strategies for aligning organizational incentive systems through contracts

Kwawu, W E K and Hughes, W P (2008) Strategies for aligning organizational incentive systems through contracts. In: Dainty, A (ed.) Proceedings of 24th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1-3 September 2008, Cardiff, UK.

Abstract

A common issue in construction contracting is how to get contractors and suppliers to improve their performance. In improving performance, the most effective processes involve knowledge and information management activities, which cross organizational boundaries and supply chains. However, the complexity and fragmentation of the supply chain’s contractual interfaces often lead to the nonalignment of incentive contracts. By organizations mapping out and aligning incentives, performance measures and reward systems along their supply chain, beneficial incentive systems can be identified. In addition, dialogue will be encouraged and information made explicit. Information to be captured will include organizational needs, strategies, shared values and beliefs, resources, process issues, and internal and external influences. An illustrative case study revealed that a project suffered gross misalignment when the incentive flow-down along its supply chains was mapped out. Preliminary findings indicate that the majority of the contracts were fixed-price contracts. The use of standard forms of contract was also widespread in the supply chain for this project. The preliminary findings indicate that developing an 'incentive map' can be used to encourage negotiations between the various external organizations at the start of new projects. In addition, an 'incentive map' provides the basis for an incentivization structure that increases performance through collaborative working. In practice, mapping can be used to generate valuable information; secure innovative responses from the supply chain members; and identifying potential problems between incentives and performance measures at the different interfaces along the supply chain.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: contractual relationships; incentive; mapping; performance; supply chain
Index terms: case study, misalignment, organizational boundary, shared value, contractual relationship, mapping, performance measure, negotiation, incentivization, strategy, incentive contract, fragmentation, complexity, standard form of contract, reward system
Subjects: spatial and geospatial analysis, contractual arrangements, performance measurement, systems engineering, business, engineering problems, contractual relationship, equitable outcomes, risk assessment, conflict resolution, sociology, data collection methods, management
Topics: Organizational Design, Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy, Value Management, Research Practice, Human Resources, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Quality Management, Procurement, Contract Administration
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here