Domestic private finance project development in China

Li, B (2008) Domestic private finance project development in China. In: Dainty, A (ed.) Proceedings of 24th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1-3 September 2008, Cardiff, UK.

Abstract

In the past two decades, hundreds cases of BOT projects achieved both public and private sectors' expectations while many others were under-performance, or even said failure. Past researches suggest that despite of project self complexity and difficulty, its ecological factors play important roles in determining its implementation results. Many BOT project foreign investors in China complained loses in the mid of 1990s; the total number of BOT projects also reduce significantly at the same time. However, a new wave of private capital investing into infrastructure project occurred from the start of new century, though most of players are domestic privately-run company. Whether these flower buds will wither like those in 1990s? This article will explore the new development issues of politics, economics, and social in the China BOT environment. A toll bridge project, Citong of Quanzhou city will be studied according to its ecological aspects. Though it succeeded in the government policy “to input a small amount of public capital, to direct large sum of private money, to achieve the development of infrastructure and economic”, the toll bridge project indicated a series of risks and challenges, such as misaligning with highway because of two different responsible agencies.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: BOT; private finance; project ecology
Index terms: implementation, China, bridge project, project development, infrastructure project, agency, complexity, government policy, private sector, toll, politics, private finance, investor, project ecology
Subjects: infrastructure and transport systems, industry analysis, systems engineering, political science, transportation engineering, sociology, Geography, health safety and environment, contractual arrangements, project delivery, public policy
Topics: Governance, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here