Tender price modelling: artificial neural networks and regression techniques

Elhag, T M S (2004) Tender price modelling: artificial neural networks and regression techniques. PhD thesis, University of Liverpool, UK.

Abstract

Cost modelling in construction is the art and science of developing a reliable and effective estimation of the tender price of a project. Cost estimation is an experiencebased task, which involves evaluations of unknown circumstances and complex relationships of cost-influencing factors. Researchers argue that cost model developments lack rigour and consistent conceptual framework within which the performance of different models may be compared and evaluated. This study analyses construction cost models by classifying them into three groups according to the techniques used. These include deterministic models (regression analysis); probabilistic models (Monte Carlo simulation); and artificial intelligence models (neural networks). This research investigates the development of two methodologies for tender price estimation of buildings utilising neural computing and regression techniques. The emphasis is to provide clients and practitioners with a reliable tool, which would offer trustworthy advice and prediction of tender prices at an early stage of a construction project. The analysis in this research is based upon a data set of 230 office projects, newly constructed in the UK between 1983 and 1997. The cost data of these buildings consists of tender prices and 13 other cost influencing factors. The data extracted using the Building Cost Information Service (BCIS) database of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS). Questionnaire survey and interviews were adopted to identify, evaluate and rank cost significant factors according to their degree of influence on tender prices. The practitioners involved in this stage were UK based quantity surveyors. Some of these cost variables formulate the basis for developing the tender estimation models. Cluster analysis was conducted to categorise the data set into more homogeneous project groups based upon the cost variables. The hypothesis is that developing estimation models using project categories would yield better performance and more efficient models. Self-Organising Maps (SOM), a type of neural networks, is used for the cluster analysis. Seventeen neural networks and thirteen regression models are developed for tender price estimation using different parameters and cost factors. The performance and efficiency of these models are analysed and compared before and after the cluster analysis of the data set. On the other hand, sensitivity analysis is conducted by developing fifty-five models to evaluate the effectiveness of different combinationso f network parameterso n the accuracyo f tenderp rice estimation. The research findings indicate that, when the whole data set of 230 office projects is used, both methodologies produced low accuracy and failed to map the relationship between the tender price and the selected influencing cost factors. On the contrary, after clustering the data set into coherent groups using Kohonen neural networks, the performance of both RA and ANN models increased dramatically, with many estimation accuracies above 80% and 90%, which is highly satisfactory for tender price estimation at an early stage of a project. The outcomes imply that: (a) clustering the projects into homogeneous categories is significant and key for model performance and accuracy; (b) after cluster analysis there is no significant difference in the performance of RA and ANN models, although the RA outperformed the ANN in some models. The results also reveal that for both methodologies the accuracy of the estimation models that utilised two cost factors (project area and duration) outperformed the estimation models that used 13 cost factors, which is an indication that area and duration are the most dominant cost determinant variables.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: artificial intelligence; cluster analysis; computing; construction cost; cost modelling; duration; interview; Monte Carlo simulation; neural network
Index terms: effectiveness, self-organizing, modelling, determinant, cost data, duration, clustering, artificial intelligence, regression analysis, efficiency, office project, cost information, quantity surveying, regression model, influencing factor, Monte Carlo simulation, construction cost, database, cost factor, estimation, Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, methodology, construction project, cluster analysis, computing, practitioner, questionnaire, cost model, conceptual framework, interview, sensitivity analysis, cost estimating, maps, science, tender price, neural network, accuracy, survey, artificial neural network
Subjects: environmental hazards, statistical analysis, data management, project controls, sociology, production management, professional development, theoretical framing, spatial and geospatial analysis, research methods, tendering, accounting and finance, performance management, economics, artificial intelligence, data science, data analysis and analytics, financial and cost management, analytical methods, modelling and simulation, professional institution, specialized education, practitioner, computing systems, data collection methods, risk assessment, construction type, profession
Topics: Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Cost Management, Information Management, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Time Control, Digital Applications, Risk Management, Sustainability, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Education, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here