Grimes, G A (2004) Recovering capital expenditures: The railroad industry paradox. PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA.
Abstract
Following deregulation in 1980, the U.S. freight railroad industry invested large amounts of capital, expanded output and increased earnings, but—paradoxically—it did not earn a competitive return on investment. As a result, investors became increasingly wary of expanding investment in this industry, even as demand for rail transportation services continued to grow. In recent years, investment has been constrained, capacity has become more restricted, prices have risen, and returns to investment have improved but continue to fall below the industry's cost of capital. This research examines the possibility that railroad capital expenditures represent an incremental cost of traffic that was, and may continue to be, substantially underestimated in industry calculations of marginal cost. As a result, railroad pricing strategies may rely on overstated contribution ratios that do not consider the full incremental capital cost associated with each shipment. Because railroads invest more capital, as a percentage of revenue, than any other major industry sector, they are particularly vulnerable to such miscalculations. All variable costs (expenses and investments) must be included in marginal cost calculations if the economic value of the firm is to be maximized in the way it prices its goods and services. This research combines engineering, economic, and financial methods and makes contributions in each area. Railroad maintenance strategies that rely more heavily on capital investment are more cost effective. Infrastructure capital spending is caused by current and future output, and is therefore a short run marginal cost. Railroad marginal cost formulae appear to substantially underestimate the true incremental nature of ongoing capital expenditures. Regulatory average variable cost formulae do not incorporate variable capital expenditures suggesting that Surface Transportation Board estimates of revenue to variable cost are overstated, subjecting a larger share of rail traffic to potential economic regulation than would otherwise occur.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Barkan, C P L |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | traffic; capital investment; pricing; regulation; capital expenditure; investment |
| Index terms: | strategy, revenue, capital cost, capital investment, industry sector, paradox, capital expenditure, regulation, investor, pricing, estimate, return on investment, deregulation |
| Subjects: | accounting and finance, management, sociology, political science, regulatory law, industry analysis, economic analysis, financial and cost management, social theory and frameworks |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Governance, Stakeholder Management, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here