Delay forecasting using a vulnerability index

Kim, J (2004) Delay forecasting using a vulnerability index. PhD thesis, Purdue University, USA.

Abstract

Delays are considered to be among the most important issues in the construction industry due to their frequent occurrence and the severity of their impacts. Most studies on delays have focused on after-the-fact analysis because of great interest in financially sensitive and practical subjects such as liability evaluation and damage assessment. On the contrary, forecasting or predicting delays has been treated as a relatively less important research subject despite its potential, due to the difficulty in forecasting possible delays and the lack of a methodology to predict the effects. In construction, the experience and intuition of experts play an important role in managing delay forecasting. However, the subjectivity of this expert knowledge and the numerous variables due to the variety of conditions and the uniqueness of each project are obstacles to a systematic approach to delay forecasting. The proposed research suggests the concept of activity vulnerability and a tangible index quantifying the vulnerability characteristic of a construction activity. A systematic framework to quantify the subjective expert knowledge and to assess the criticality of the delay impacts is presented. Experienced opinions on the activity vulnerability, the relationship between the condition of delay factors and their impact on construction activities, are quantified through the proposed fuzzy methodology. Finally, the quantified subjectivity is expressed in the form of a vulnerability index for future management reference. In addition, a method of forecasting the delay risk in construction operations based on the vulnerability index is presented. Application of the vulnerability index in scheduling simulation enables delay risk forecasting in construction operations with delay factor conditions considered.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Halpin, D W
Uncontrolled Keywords: liability; subjectivity; forecasting; scheduling; simulation
Index terms: subjectivity, liability, scheduling, intuition, methodology, vulnerability, construction activity, construction operation, forecasting, construction industry, damage assessment
Subjects: human factors and perception, operations research, construction operations, prediction and forecasting, structural engineering, research methods, cognitive psychology, industry analysis, liability law, environmental hazards
Topics: Research Practice, Site Management, Time Control, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here