McLean, W P (2004) Inspector discretion and industry compliance in the street-level implementation of building codes. PhD thesis, University of New Orleans, USA.
Abstract
This dissertation examines inspector discretion and industry compliance in the street-level implementation of building codes. In particular, this study examines the effects that agency-level, individual-level, and environmental variables have on the choice of inspectors to exercise discretion. Unique to this study is the examination of policy congruence between building departments and street-level inspectors as a predictor of industry compliance with regulatory policy. In addition, the various effects of building department enforcement philosophies, departmental capacity for enforced compliance, and environmental variables are considered. The findings indicate that regulatory policy implementation and impact are complex phenomena. There is no single, best predictor for determining what influences inspector behavior and industry compliance. Rather, this study shows that it is a multiplicity of factors, in concert, that shape regulatory outputs and outcomes. From this dissertation we can learn lessons that can be applied to other policy areas to create a better understanding of inspector discretion, improve industry compliance with regulations, and achieve more effective street-level implementation and understanding of policy impact.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | compliance; policy; regulation |
| Index terms: | regulation, dissertation, philosophy, agency, policy implementation, building code, compliance, policy impact, implementation, exercise, enforcement |
| Subjects: | philosophical studies, health safety and environment, contractual arrangements, regulatory law, sociology, political science, policy studies, health behaviours and lifestyles, research dissemination and communication |
| Topics: | Governance, Procurement, Health and Safety, Legal Issues, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here