Merna, T (2004) Assessing methods to analyse portfolios of projects and their risks procured by project finance. PhD thesis, University of Manchester, UK.
Abstract
Project finance provides a method of financing projects, relying on the revenues generated by the project to repay lenders. Organisations utilising project finance are exposed to risk and uncertainty over the life cycle of the project. The commercial viability of such projects can be assessed in terms of their economic parameters, those being the Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Payback Period (PB) and Cash Lock Up (CLU).In both the United Kingdom and Germany under the relevant Private Finance Initiatives (PFI’s), usually on the basis of Public-Private Partnerships (PPP’s), projects now are being procured or considered in bundles rather than on an individual, stand-alone basis. For the purpose of financial analysis, bundled projects can be considered as portfolios of projects. When projects are considered individually, some may be commercially viable as stand-alone projects and others may not. However, when projects are bundled together, an overall portfolio of projects may meet a promoter’s Minimum Acceptable Rate of Return (MARR) and be deemed commercially viable.This study reviews the concepts of project finance, risk management, portfolio management and the PFI in relation to assessing the commercial viability of portfolios of projects. A questionnaire is used to determine current methods of assessing portfolios, in this study respondents from 60 organisations provided data which was duly analysed by the author.A mechanism is developed to determine the economic parameters of a portfolio or bundle of projects by assessing the worst, base and best case scenarios based on the risks associated with each individual project forming part of the portfolio.The computer software, Computer Aided Simulation for Project Appraisal and Review (CASPAR) is combined with spreadsheets to model portfolios and simulate different scenarios in terms costs, revenues, durations and financial instruments.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | uncertainty; revenues; financing; life cycle; project appraisal; project finance; public private partnerships; risk management; Germany; United Kingdom; financial analysis; net present value; simulation; duration; partnership; private finance initiative |
| Index terms: | spreadsheet, portfolio management, net present value, life cycle, partnership, risk management, public private partnership, duration, computer aided simulation, revenue, financial analysis, United Kingdom, project appraisal, payback, Germany, questionnaire, private finance initiative, promoter, financing, project finance |
| Subjects: | modelling and simulation, project delivery, design economy, economic analysis, data science, contractual arrangements, data collection methods, risk assessment, value management, sociology, partnership management, project controls, financial management, Geography |
| Topics: | Procurement, Risk Management, Project Management, Geographical Context, Time Control, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here