Noguchi, M (2004) A choice model for mass customisation of lower-cost and higher-performance housing in sustainable development. PhD thesis, McGill University, Canada.
Abstract
Market demand for housing changes over time, in response to the wants and needs of both individuals and society. Changes in socio-demographics highlight the emergence of non-traditional households in Canada and influence the configuration of a house (or product) which meets buyers' individual requirements. In turn, this affects the design approach (or process). At the same time, society today requires sustainability in housing development, since building a house consumes large amounts of energy during construction and after occupancy. Technology that improves the cost and performance of housing has advanced over time. Although some innovative design and construction systems (or approaches) that attempt to meet societal and individual demands for housing are available in today's market, homebuilders tend not to apply unfamiliar approaches to their housing developments, since their business operation is often based on convention. Another reason, which inhibits a builder's adoption of new housing technology, is the extra cost required for seeking and analysing information. Thus, the homebuilders' decision-making processes for the adoption of ‘familiar’ and ‘unfamiliar’ design and construction systems (or housing systems) which affect the configuration of housing need to be well programmed. Accordingly, this study, composed of four parts, focuses initially on identifying housing market trends and issues in Quebec, as well as introducing the new concept of mass customisation that encourages homebuilders to standardise parts of a house—i.e. the creation of mass custom homes. Then, in consideration of this new concept, as well as a value analysis approach that helps facilitate homebuilders' buying decisions, it proposes a choice model for the design and construction approaches to the delivery of ‘lower-cost and higher-performance’ housing. Thirdly, to assess its practicality, the proposed decision-making model is demonstrated in collaboration with a selected homebuilder in Quebec. Finally, the results of this study are discussed in depth in order to identify future research opportunities. In view of the demonstration project conducted in this study, the author concluded that the proposed ‘choice model’ could function effectively as a practical decision-making support tool (or system) that helps open the door for homebuilders to generate and select alternatives that aid them to produce lower-cost and higher-performance housing. As a consequence of programming the homebuilders' buying decision-making process, the goal identification uncertainty and goal/purchase matching uncertainty, which often hinder their adoption of unfamiliar, innovative housing systems, could be reduced, or eliminated.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Friedman, A |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction systems; emergence; market; sustainability; uncertainty; homes; occupancy; collaboration; housing development; programming; builder; Canada |
| Index terms: | decision-making process, Canada, household, design and construction, mass customization, demographics, society, sustainable development, builder, value analysis, housing development, decision-making, collaboration, programming, configuration, housing need, emergence, construction system, housing |
| Subjects: | practitioner, programming, construction type, contractual arrangements, Geography, health safety and environment, manufacturing engineering, management, financial analysis, systems engineering, communities and social development, decision analysis, building construction, housing and residential development, demography |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Procurement, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Construction Technology, Cost Management, Organizational Design, Urban Studies, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here