Life cycle assessment of residential buildings

Ochoa Franco, L A (2004) Life cycle assessment of residential buildings. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, USA.

Abstract

This work proposes a model to conduct the life cycle assessment of a U.S. residential building, from a construction materials and energy consumption standpoint. It illustrates three case studies in different U.S. Cities (Pittsburgh, San Antonio, and Ann Arbor), considering three life-cycle phases: Construction, usage, and disposal. Direct and indirect environmental effects among the different economic sectors were assessed along the housing life throughout the on-line system “economic input-output life cycle assessment” (Carnegie Mellon). Construction characterization was done using an off-the-shelf tool (RSMeans). The on-line energy consumption estimator system “Home Energy Saver” (DOE & EPA) was used to estimate the home energy consumption along its usage stage. Statistical data were used to define standard patterns for housing remodeling and maintenance on the whole, it was intended to frame the study on the general principles of the ISO 14040's series. Inventory results were interpreted by a multi-criteria evaluation method proposed for three suggested global environmental indicators. In the three case studies the environmental stressors most important for the construction phase were the same (soil toxicity, ores depletion, and polluted air). As for the usage phase, results from the three case studies coincided in that this was the most important phase in the life-cycle assessment of a residence. In this research approach, the disposal phase played a minor role. It was also conducted a sensitivity analysis that proved a sound model performance, and results were discussed from different standpoints.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Hendrickson, C
Uncontrolled Keywords: energy consumption; residential; inventory; construction phase; life cycle; estimator; case study
Index terms: estimator, criteria evaluation, housing, ISO, residential building, sensitivity analysis, life cycle, depletion, construction material, energy consumption, environmental effect, case study, inventory, construction phase, stressors, life cycle assessment, estimate
Subjects: building materials, environmental hazards, environmental resource management, profession, value management, decision analysis, financial and cost management, health conditions and diseases, energy systems, environmental impact, construction type, inventory management, standards development, data collection methods, project delivery
Topics: Health and Safety, Roles and Professions, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Sustainability, Research Practice, Project Management, Quality Management, Construction Technology, Supply Chain Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here