Benne, B C (2005) Managing AEC project organizations at the edge of chaos: An analysis of AEC projects' adaptive capacity from a living systems perspective. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
Abstract
Architectural, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) projects are complex organizations that operate within complex, dynamic and uncertain environments. Project performance is based on the organizations' ability to manage efficiently and deliver innovative solutions, thereby delivering value to clients. Conventional project management is grounded on the old mechanistic and deterministic belief that an organization and its environment operate as linear, cause-and-effect systems that, therefore, are predictable. Monitoring performance consists of identifying disturbances in the environment so as to predict change and work out a plan to manage it, thereby maintaining organizational equilibrium. However, conventional management strategies have been rather limited in their effectiveness for managing today's project organizations in complex and uncertain environments. Complexity theory has shown that the behavior of complex systems cannot be predicted, because even the tiniest disturbance may be amplified over time by a nonlinear chain of cause-and-effects that cannot be foreseen. From this theoretical perspective, an AEC project organization is a complex adaptive system and more specifically, a living system. A living system has the adaptive capacity to self-organize when faced with uncertainties, i.e. , it can modify the connections among its components so that its overall behavior is better adapted to the new situation. This exploratory study uses understanding derived from living systems theory as a means to develop a new AEC project performance model that provides a framework for assessing an organization's adaptive capacity. To illustrate, it describes two case studies, the International Terminal at the San Francisco Airport and the San José Martin Luther King Library, which were investigated through interviews with project participants in different disciplines and different companies that made up the respective project organizations. The case studies demonstrate that different project organizations respond to their challenges with different adaptive capacities that affect their ability to learn and self-organize. The higher the adaptive capacity of a project organization, the more value is delivered throughout the project life cycle and less waste is generated. Based on these findings, it is suggested that new project management strategies emerging from a deeper understanding of organizations as living systems have the potential to produce improved project performance.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Kalay, Y E |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | complex adaptive system; complexity; effectiveness; systems theory; airport; life cycle; monitoring; project organization; client; project performance; case studies; interview |
| Index terms: | project organization, exploratory study, strategy, complex adaptive system, interview, complexity, systems theory, complex system, adaptive capacity, life cycle, case study, management strategy, project management, project performance, effectiveness, monitoring |
| Subjects: | systems engineering, project management theory and practice, urban design, organizational theory, research methods, performance management, management, theoretical framing, value management, control systems, business, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Site Management, Organizational Design, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 CTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here