Miller, S and Dorée, A (2008) Improving logistics in the asphalt paving process: What can we learn from the planner's logic? In: Dainty, A (ed.) Proceedings of 24th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1-3 September 2008, Cardiff, UK.
Abstract
Significant public procurement changes are forcing road construction companies to professionalise planning and control of asphalt paving projects. In an effort to outperform competitors, companies seek better control over the paving process, over the planning and scheduling of resources and work, and over performance. For the asphalt paving companies to be able to improve product and process performance, they now - more than ever - acknowledge they need to develop intricate understanding of the asphalt paving process and the interdependencies with the logistics. We focus on lessons learnt from an analysis of truck resources used in the asphalt paving process on three road construction projects in the east of The Netherlands. The aim is to explore the decision-making process and unravel the logic that planners use in determining truck resources for transporting asphalt from the asphalt plant to the construction site. Three methods are used to firstly, analyse and secondly, compare resource allocation. The methods are calculations based on fleet-demand principles, calculations based on the National Highway Institute Method and an analysis using the EZStrobe simulation software. The results show that all three methods provide the planner with more accurate means of determining the truck resources required for the transport of asphalt from the plant to the site. It appears that the planner has not considered the differing travel distances and cycle times in determining truck resource requirements. This work is ongoing and forms part of an overall action research study aimed at improving the logistics operations within the asphalt paving process through exploring the choices planners make in determining and allocating essential resources.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | asphalt; logistics; modelling; productivity; simulation |
| Index terms: | road construction, Netherlands, process performance, scheduling, paving, modelling, resource allocation, action research, decision-making process, productivity, construction site, planner |
| Subjects: | civil engineering, work location, management, profession, Geography, resource management, decision analysis, performance measurement, analytical methods, operations research, transportation engineering, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Site Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Quality Management, Business Strategy, Risk Management, Time Control, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here