Ojiako, G U (2005) Project failures: A comparative study of information and communication technologies (ICT) and construction projects. PhD thesis, University of Northumbria at Newcastle, UK.
Abstract
In the ICT industry, since deregulation business objectives have been closely linked to the lowering of prices and improvement in quality of service. Unfortunately, the industry has arguably failed to deliver the majority of its projects. This research examines this described failure and considers the reasons why it occurs. As a starting point, the research suggests that the ICT industry might be better off by comparing its progress against that already made by the construction industry, an industry involved in projects with similar characteristics such as complex relationships, detailed information and long delivery periods over many phases. A framework demonstrating similarities and differences in project characteristics between construction and ICT was developed from available literature. The framework was examined and refined by carrying out in-depth interviews. It was then tested using data from a survey of professionals involved in Construction and ICT projects. The results of the analysis indicate that there are no fundamental differences either in the definition of projects or the application of project management systems, principles and methodologies between the two industries. Therefore this is not the reason for the failure of project delivery within ICT. The real problem appears to be in the method of project performance measurement, which is based on an approach to project success that is separate from progress measurement criteria.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Greenwood, D |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | failure; measurement; construction project; communication; project delivery; project success; professional; project performance; interview |
| Index terms: | construction project, methodology, interview, information and communication technology, survey, comparative study, project performance, deregulation, construction industry, progress measurement, project management, project delivery, quality of service, project failure, project success |
| Subjects: | public and environmental health, research methods, project management theory and practice, production management, project controls, regulatory law, industry analysis, research design and methodology, project completion, data collection methods, computing systems, project delivery |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Time Control, Digital Applications, Procurement, Health and Safety, Project Management, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here