Tuomela, A (2005) Network service organisation: interaction in workplace networks. PhD thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, Finland.
Abstract
"In this doctoral dissertation, various widely understood disciplines of facilities and business support functions are integrated into one concept workplace network that consists of the network actor roles of service providers, contract managers, and the end-users of services. There is a limited understanding of the business networks behind the structures of workplace networks. In this doctoral dissertation, a modified grounded theory of interaction and cooperation of workplace networks is generated. The dissertation integrates six scientifically reviewed research papers that focus on generating, testing and refining a theory of interaction in workplace network management. The main focus of the dissertation lies in answering the question: ""How can workplace networks improve their interaction and cooperation?"" A modified grounded theory is used in the dissertation as a research strategy for integrating data analysis from three research phases. During these phases, a grounded theory of network service organisation interaction is generated, tested, and refined. The general analytic strategy is based on multiple triangulation methods, such as coding and network analysis. The first phase conceptualises a novel theoretical framework of network service organisation which extends the previously developed paradigm models of CRE and FM as well as provides a different means to assess social networks behind the complex environment. The second phase tests the qualities of the framework and explores the qualities of the workplace network interaction and cooperation in four pilot study environments. In the third phase, a final case study is conducted for refining the qualities of a theory of network service organisation in Finnish real estate owner organisation. The research process is based on interpretivisms and hermeneutics and abductive reasoning. The empirical data collection is mainly based on interviews during the three phases. The results provide understanding of the workplace network roles and imply new insights on workplace network interaction and cooperation. The results suggest that the network members responsible for workplace network management should create more organised forms of formal interaction in order to strengthen the multi-level cooperation within their business relationships."
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | case study; grounded theory; network service organisation; workplace network |
| Index terms: | testing, interaction, dissertation, paradigm, real estate, owner, grounded theory, network analysis, case study, business relationship, abductive reasoning, cooperation, triangulation, social network, strategy, interview, research paper, contract manager, data analysis, interpretivism |
| Subjects: | sociology, behavioral psychology, theoretical framing, education and knowledge transfer, management, real estate economics, psychology, professional practice, data analysis and analytics, research design and methodology, research dissemination and communication, data collection methods, strategic management, practitioner |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Urban Studies, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here