Vidalis, S M (2005) Relation between cost, quality, and risk in portland cement concrete pavement construction. PhD thesis, University of Florida, USA.
Abstract
In highway cement concrete pavement construction, the contractor decides what levels of quality to target under statistical quality assurance specifications. The selection of appropriate target quality levels affects both the probability of being awarded a project and the subsequent profit margin. Contractors are currently using the deterministic approach in selecting combined target acceptance quality characteristics. This approach does not take risk and probabilities into consideration. A new procedure using the probabilistic approach has been addressed. This probabilistic approach has been developed into a computer program that calculates the risks and probabilities in selecting the overall target quality. This proposed procedure and accompanying computer program can help a contractor select target quality levels that will maximize profit in a specific situation. It will also assist state highway agencies in validating their quality assurance specifications and pay adjustment provisions. Based on the analysis conducted, it was found that the deterministic and probabilistic methods do not necessarily identify the same optimal target values. The difference in answers between the two methods can mean a significant difference in profit. The proposed procedure is an improvement because it relies on computer simulation to replace time-consuming trial and error.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Najafi, F T |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | highway; pavement; specifications; quality assurance; probability; simulation |
| Index terms: | quality assurance, specification, pavement construction, profit, computer program, agency, computer simulation |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, sociology, modelling and simulation, quality assurance, infrastructure engineering, contractual condition, software systems |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Business Strategy, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Contract Administration |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here