Condon, E J (2006) The project game: Strategic estimating on major projects. PhD thesis, University of Calgary, Canada.
Abstract
Major projects are at the forefront of economic development. In Alberta, major projects, including numerous projects with capital costs in excess of CAD$500 million, are at the centre of the development of the province's vast oil sands deposits, which possess estimated reserves second only to Saudi Arabia. However, the continued development of this resource is at risk following a spate of significant cost overruns on these projects. Many reasons have been put forward for these overruns, including labour resource constraints, poor productivity, rising material costs, and so forth. These reasons are comparable to those found in literature, and support the use of project management best practices to help address the situation. There is another potential reason for the overruns: the initial estimates may have been inadequate. The notion of initial underestimation leading to project overruns has not been well addressed in project literature. The objectives of this research were to examine why underestimation occurs on most major projects, and why it appears to persist through the execution phase of projects. To achieve those objectives, the research looked at project estimation processes, the influences on those processes, and the interactions among participants involved in those processes. The research was based on a quantitative-qualitative triangulation methodology approach, consisting of three phases in conjunction with the literature review. Phase One was a questionnaire given to cost estimation, control and project management specialists. Phase Two was a Modified Delphi with experts from owner, consultant and contractor companies involved in oil sands projects. Phase Three consisted of case study research on two major oil sands programs. The results of the research highlighted that projects are being pushed to early approval, and that strategic estimation is used to secure that approval. A lack of trust between owners and contractors, and limited availability of experienced owner personnel, are contributing to low estimates. In addition, there are delays in reporting cost and schedule variances due to reluctance to give or receive bad news. Contingency is used to mask the threat of cost overruns until it is too late to address the threat.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | best practice; contingency; cost estimation; labour; major projects; personnel; productivity; consultant; owner; economic development; trust; case study; Saudi Arabia |
| Index terms: | triangulation, estimating, program, methodology, questionnaire, literature review, overrun, approval, personnel, economic development, capital cost, cost estimating, sand, interaction, estimate, project management, labour resource, best practice, cost overrun, productivity, owner, estimation, major project, variance, case study, Saudi Arabia |
| Subjects: | business, research design and methodology, data collection methods, contractual role, financial and cost management, strategic project management, data analysis and analytics, building materials, project management theory and practice, Geography, software systems, research methods, accounting and finance, economic development, management, behavioral psychology, sociology, measurement and scaling, project controls, business economics |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Contract Administration, Time Control, Human Resources, Digital Applications, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here