Salama, M; El Hamid, M A and Keogh, B (2008) Investigating the causes of delay within oil and gas projects in the UAE. In: Dainty, A (ed.) Proceedings of 24th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1-3 September 2008, Cardiff, UK.
Abstract
The soaring Oil prices are expected to reflect on the impact of delays within Oil and Gas projects in monetary terms due to the revenues forgone. This study aims at investigating the main causes of delays within Oil and Gas projects in UAE. Reviewing the literature on Oil and Gas projects, there were few studies found to be concerned with this problem. The literature indicates some similarities shared with construction projects. However, the factors identified in the literature as causes of delays in construction projects might not apply to Oil and Gas projects due to the differences between the two industries. Therefore, the literature review concluded that more research is needed on this area. The research method comprised interviews with experts for the purpose of identifying the most important factors leading to time overruns. A questionnaire based on the outcome of the interviews together with the relevant factors mentioned in the construction literature was sent to a sample of 100 practitioners to elect the most important factors that cause delays. Besides listing the most important factors as identified by the sample surveyed, the study concluded that contrary to the prevalent belief amongst most practitioners regarding the insignificance of the impact of delays within the (FEED) phase on the overall durationof the project, the data analysis indicated a strong correlation between delays within the FEED phase and the total delay at the end of the project. The study recommends that delays in the FEED phase should set an early warning and a call for immediate remedial actions to hedge against an overall delay, most likely to occur.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | causes of delays; EPC projects; oil and gas projects |
| Index terms: | interview, data analysis, time overrun, literature review, revenue, early warning, construction project, causes of delay, questionnaire, practitioner, oil and gas |
| Subjects: | data analysis and analytics, economic analysis, practitioner, data collection methods, industry analysis, project controls, production management, financial risk |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Project Management, Research Practice, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here