Lim, K H (2006) Causal model for management of subcontractors in waste minimization. PhD thesis, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Abstract
This study presents a causal model to explain the dynamic construction waste generation behaviour exhibited by subcontractors in Singapore and how waste can be minimized. Based on causal methodology, the Construction Waste Minimization model was constructed using Supply Chain Management and Management Control concepts. From these concepts, eight main strategies and other factors for main contractors to manage subcontractors in waste minimization were identified. The model was tested in two ways. Firstly, a postal questionnaire survey of contractors and subcontractors in Singapore was undertaken to check the validity of the variables in the model. Secondly, three in-depth case studies were conducted to confirm the causal loops in the model. The survey results and case study findings confirm that the model is valid and the case studies corroborate the model's practical application. It is recommended that main contractors use this model to manage subcontractors in waste minimization aspect.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Ofori, G |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | supply chain management; Singapore; case study; questionnaire survey; subcontractor |
| Index terms: | subcontractor, methodology, questionnaire, strategy, survey, minimization, construction waste, validity, main contractor, Singapore, case study |
| Subjects: | management, algorithms, research methods, Geography, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, waste management, practitioner |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Sustainability, Digital Applications, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here