A case study of management control. A construction project: Issues of transaction costs and trust

Mat Zin, R (2006) A case study of management control. A construction project: Issues of transaction costs and trust. PhD thesis, University of Manchester, UK.

Abstract

This thesis is the result of an intensive, in-depth case study of a building construction project that is characterised by high uncertainty and strong dependencies between its contributors. The complexity of transaction relationships involving independent firms of contributors (e.g.architect, engineers, quantity surveyor, main contractor, sub-contractors and suppliers), leads to interesting insights into how control works within construction project organisations. A case study method is adopted to investigate the case, using a triangulation data collection, including interviews, observations and documents. The themes and concepts from the data gathered were coded, identified, and categorised through a constant comparison with relevant theories from the literature. As a result of grounded theory analysis, an initial theoretical framework of transaction cost economics theory is extended to make sense of the case study. The initial framework suggests that the transaction characteristics (asset specificity, uncertainty, and frequency) and individual attributes (bounded rationality and opportunism) were relevant in choosing management control patterns of inter-firm relationships. Contracts are generally used to create project organisation, but are unavoidably incomplete. Hence, formal contract is not the only solution to the control and coordination problems. The framework extends TCE propositions by suggesting that informal or social control mechanisms can encourage cooperative behaviour of transacting parties and may also influence a relationship's control structure. Consistent with these arguments, the findings showed that in addition to formal process of managing contractual requirements to gain efficiency, informal processes (i.e. coordinating interdependent tasks) influenced the choice of MCS. Furthermore, control was to manage and guarantee continuity of transaction relationships in particular to cope with uncertainty due to the incomplete contract. The observations suggest that by selecting familiar or known contributors and with reputation to some extent mitigate control problems and thereby reduce the need for costly formal controls. The case revealed a number of control mechanisms consisting of management accounting practices, such as planning and scheduling, budgeting, work progress monitoring, and performance evaluation were used for both formal and informal control purposes. Hence, the thesis leads to an understanding that market-based and bureaucracy based control patterns (as suggested by TCE) are blended with social-based control when inter-firm relationships are complex and due to strong dependency of transacting parties in project-based organisations.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: complexity; coordination; efficiency; rationality; transaction cost; trust; uncertainty; grounded theory; construction project; budgeting; management accounting; monitoring; performance evaluation; project organisation; scheduling; quantity surveyor; case study
Index terms: sub-contractor, management accounting, documents, progress monitoring, construction project, performance evaluation, triangulation, complexity, guarantee, transaction cost, opportunism, scheduling, rationality, interview, cooperative behaviour, project-based organization, budgeting, social control, project organization, building construction, bounded rationality, architect, monitoring, coordination, case study, quantity surveying, main contractor, efficiency, asset specificity, grounded theory, engineer
Subjects: social justice, building construction, project controls, financial analysis, systems engineering, performance management, decision-making and reasoning, contract structure, performance measurement, financial management, management, theoretical framing, professional development, organizational theory, economic concepts, production management, operations research, psychology, economic analysis, organization, research design and methodology, business, profession, data collection methods, control systems, practitioner
Topics: Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Information Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Time Control, Site Management, Organizational Design, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Quality Management, Ethics
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here