Peng, M (2006) Item-level quantity-based preliminary cost estimating system for highway structures and miscellaneous construction. PhD thesis, University of Texas at Austin, USA.
Abstract
The intent of this research was to improve the preliminary cost estimating procedures at the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) and develop a computational tool that simplifies the process of preparing preliminary cost estimates. An item-level quantity-based approach was proposed for this research study. The primary motive for this approach was to segregate the impacts of unit prices from the estimates in order to improve accuracy and reduce the difficulty in updating the estimating models. Furthermore, this approach enables continuous tracking and control by initiating quantity estimates at the outset. This research study was focused on the development of statistical models for predicting item-level quantities based upon available basic project parameters. Major work items, defined as those accounting for 80 percent of the total cost, were identified for each major project type in TxDOT; and either a statistical prediction model or a fixed cost percentage was developed for each major work item based upon historical data. These quantity models and fixed cost percentages were integrated into a database management system, Preliminary Item-Level Cost Estimating System (PILCES), to estimate costs at both the item-level and the project-level. This dissertation discusses the statistical quantity models for structures-related and miscellaneous construction-related major work items. The design concept and implementation of PILCES are also described in this dissertation.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | O'Connor, J T |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | accuracy; highway; cost estimating; estimating |
| Index terms: | major project, database, motive, dissertation, statistical model, cost estimate, implementation, estimate, prediction model, accuracy, management system, cost estimating, estimating, accounting |
| Subjects: | professional development, management, data management, research dissemination and communication, contractual arrangements, data science, prediction and forecasting, economic analysis, financial and cost management, strategic project management, psychology |
| Topics: | Procurement, Project Management, Organizational Design, Human Resources, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Information Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here