Al-Sasi, B O (2007) A lean approach to capacity management in construction. PhD thesis, University of Southampton, UK.
Abstract
Lean construction has not been universally adopted in the UK construction industry and has had little application in heavy construction although there has been a greater uptake in the housing sector. The research has identified a number of factors, both at construction site and corporate level, which have prevented the adoption of lean principles. Firstly, the segregation of buying and construction management departments means that buyers consider only the bottom line cost of materials rather than the complete cost to a project. This results in buyers ordering materials in the maximum possible quantities to attract the largest bulk discounts without considering the associated costs. Secondly, construction site staffs have a deep-rooted fear of running out of materials and hence prefer to hold large stocks of material on site. Thirdly, high variability in output occurs in construction and where adoption of lean has been attempted, schedules have not been met and there has been an increase in defective work. Finally, the concepts of, cycle time and work scheduling are not properly understood at site level. The research initially produced a scheduling calculation model based on four methods taken from operational research: least cost; North West corner; Vogel's approximation and longest required time. The model was trialled on a construction site on the University campus. The results showed that when activities were dominated by machines the model performed well but when activities were dominated by people the variability in output made the schedules predicted by the model unworkable.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | site staff; construction site; lean construction; scheduling; UK; operational research |
| Index terms: | construction site, scheduling, lean construction, housing, operational research, site staff, variability, construction industry, heavy construction |
| Subjects: | building construction, infrastructure and transport systems, industry analysis, statistical analysis, management, operations research, work location, construction type, practitioner |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Site Management, Time Control, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here