Thomson, C S; El-Haram, M A; Hardcastle, C and Horner, R M W (2008) Developing an urban sustainability assessment protocol reflecting the project lifecycle. In: Dainty, A (ed.) Proceedings of 24th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1-3 September 2008, Cardiff, UK.
Abstract
Recent years have witnessed a recognised shift in the manner that sustainability assessment requires to be considered within building projects. In evolving away from its sole consideration as a technically based exercise, recognition has emerged of its role as contributing to a wider subjectively based approach to decision-making, that aids in the promotion of sustainability through stakeholder engagement, mediation and critically as a stimulus for learning. In order for practitioners to engage and aid the delivery of such an approach, sustainability assessment requires to be viewed as a process which is applied throughout the project lifecycle. The role of sustainability assessment across the lifecycle is addressed, in order to reflect the variations observed in the assessment tools applicable and the profile of the stakeholders involved. A cross- mapping exercise of established interpretations of the project lifecycle was conducted including the RIBA Plan of Work 1999 and 2007, Process Protocol, Building Design Management Process, the OGC Gateway Project Process and the HOK Integrated Design Process. A range of interpretations of sustainable design processes were surveyed and analysis was conducted to explore their relationships and implications for developing an Urban Sustainability Assessment Protocol. The emerging protocol is based around an adaptation of the RIBA Plan of Work 2007 which has been verified with a range of practitioners through a series of interviews. Across the protocol it emerged that each of the outlined activities related in their function to five generic phases for managing sustainability assessment across the project lifecycle i.e. scoping, sustainability planning, assessing, monitoring and auditing.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | communication; education; lifecycle; project management; sustainability |
| Index terms: | project lifecycle, decision-making, mapping, variation, building design management, promotion, exercise, interview, integrated design process, mediation, monitoring, adaptation, stakeholder engagement, plan of work, practitioner, lifecycle, sustainable design, sustainability assessment, project management |
| Subjects: | operations management, dispute resolution, spatial and geospatial analysis, project delivery, contractual condition, project management theory and practice, project completion, design process, health behaviours and lifestyles, decision analysis, data collection methods, sustainability assessment, practitioner, control systems, community and social dimensions, user focus, management |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Project Management, Contract Administration, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Risk Management, Research Practice, Design Practice, Human Resources, Roles and Professions, Site Management, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here