Bilec, M M (2007) A hybrid life cycle assessment model for construction processes. PhD thesis, University of Pittsburgh, USA.
Abstract
This research qualitatively and quantitatively examined the environmental impacts due to the construction phase of commercial buildings. Previous building research often overlooked the construction phase and focused on the material and use phases, discounting the significant environmental impacts due to construction. The research was conducted using life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, which is a systematic environmental management tool that analyzes and assesses holistically the environmental impacts of a product or process. This research contributed to further developing LCA research by focusing efforts on hybrid LCA modeling. The context of this research was established through examining green building rating systems, policy review, and project delivery methods with respect to the modeled results. Documented life cycle inventory results focused on PM emissions, GWP, SOx, NOx, CO, Pb, non-methane VOCs, energy usage, and solid and liquid wastes. Results compared with the entire building life cycle indicated that construction, while not as significant as the use phase, is as important as the other life cycle stages. In terms of hybrid LCA modeling, the augmented process based LCA proved to be effective in modeling the construction phase and allowed for efficiently combining process and input-output inventories. Including input-output results, especially construction service sectors, is critical in construction LCA modeling. One case study’s results demonstrated that services had the highest level of methane emissions and were a significant contributor to CO2 emissions. Recommendations are made in terms of green building rating systems and national policies, including placing higher significance on construction activities within the United States Green Building Council’s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) green building rating system.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction activities; inventory; commercial building; construction phase; delivery method; environmental design; environmental impact; green building; leadership; life cycle; policy; project delivery; United States; case study |
| Index terms: | inventory, CO2 emissions, case study, delivery method, building life cycle, environmental design, life cycle, construction activity, national policy, placing, construction phase, modelling, environmental management, project delivery, building research, United States, life cycle assessment, construction process, methodology, commercial building, green building, environmental impact |
| Subjects: | building construction, asset management, research management, delivery method, research methods, design practice, sustainability assessment, concrete and cementitious materials, Geography, inventory management, public policy, sustainability and energy, analytical methods, project delivery, construction operations, air quality, data collection methods, construction type, value management, environmental impact |
| Topics: | Supply Chain Management, Procurement, Sustainability, Project Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Site Management, Design Practice, Construction Technology, Governance, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Construction Materials |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here