Dulung, A Z A (2007) Computer aided decision support system for the selection of subcontractors in building refurbishment works. PhD thesis, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Abstract
Building Refurbishment (BR) projects differ from new-build projects with regard to several issues. It is well known that BR projects are perceived to be more difficult to manage, and with higher risks and uncertainties than new-build projects. The contractual relationship between main contractors and subcontractors is the major feature of these activities. Hence, subcontractors perform vital roles in these projects. Currently, however, there is a lack of knowledge relating to the selection of subcontractors for BR projects. Typically, the task is performed in an unstructured with considerable reliance on the judgment of senior staff members. The research result presents a comprehensive evaluation of decision alternatives for engaging subcontractors in BR projects and to present a CADSS which is called subcontractor selection decision support system (SSDSS). The system provides valuable guidelines to decision-makers, as well as assists them in making decisions pertaining to selecting their subcontractors for BR contracts.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Pheng, L S |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | decision support; new build; refurbishment; refurbishment works; subcontractor |
| Index terms: | decision support, new build, main contractor, subcontractor selection, subcontractor, judgment, refurbishment work, contractual relationship, building refurbishment |
| Subjects: | construction integration, decision analysis, dispute resolution, practitioner, contractual relationship, renovation and retrofit, asset management, organization |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Roles and Professions, Supply Chain Management, Contract Administration, Risk Management, Design Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here