Giammalvo, Paul D (2007) Is project management a profession? If yes, where does it fit in and if not, what is it? PhD thesis, Ecole Superieure de Commerce de Lille, France.
Abstract
The research described in this thesis has been a journey of exploration and discovery. Using a combination of positivist and post positivist approaches, both traditional and non-traditional definitions of a profession and professional have been identified; various hypotheses related to these definitions have been tested using a survey instrument; data collected from over 400 respondents has been analysed in order to understand the nature of the practice of construction management, which has failed to professionalize itself after almost 50 years of formalized practice. In conducting the research on what it means to be a ‘professional’, commercial aircraft piloting, which has in less than 100 years been accepted as a profession, was closely examined to determine what set it apart from project management. From this and other disparate explorations, the research has identified the areas of agreement, the areas of divergence, and the areas still in question regarding the past and future of project management, and from this examination distilled answers or recommendations and provided a glimpse into the future of project management. Amongst the highlights of the findings is that project management is not, by and large, regarded to be a profession. It is considered by the majority of its practitioners to be a process, methodology or system. The key attributes required to professionalize project management are not licensing, but creating a methodology, system or process which, done correctly and appropriately, can consistently deliver ‘successful’ projects and build trust in the consuming public in the competencies of the practitioners to apply these methodologies, systems or processes to deliver projects on time, within budget while substantially meeting the needs, wants an expectations of the stakeholders. From the research, a Professionalization Index has been developed that can provide a snapshot of where project management, as perceived by the practitioners, lies on the path to professionalization, when compared against other occupations.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Bredillet, Christophe N |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | occupations; trust; licensing; professional |
| Index terms: | methodology, exploration, practitioner, occupation, licensing, survey, key attribute, professionalization, project management, profession |
| Subjects: | risk assessment, data collection methods, knowledge transfer, institututions, practitioner, environmental resource management, research methods, project management theory and practice, sociology |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Sustainability, Project Management, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here