Kim, I (2007) Development and implementation of an engineering productivity measurement system (EPMS) for benchmarking. PhD thesis, University of Texas at Austin, USA.
Abstract
Reliable engineering productivity measurement is a critical element of predictable project performance and continuous improvement. Despite the fact that engineering costs have risen to levels approaching 20 percent of total project cost on some industrial projects, engineering productivity is less well understood and has received less study than construction productivity. Furthermore, engineering productivity is a critical determinant of the final cost and schedule performance of a project (Chang et al. 2001). For these reasons, metrics for assessing productivity to drive improvement are essential, especially considering trends toward offshore engineering. Applicable industry standard engineering productivity measurements must first be established and then applied to present day work processes before significant improvement and predictability of performance can be established (CII 2001). Over the years, a number of different approaches for engineering productivity measurement have been proposed. These approaches are discussed and the development of the CII Benchmarking and Metrics approach, a direct measurement approach, is presented for this research. This research: (1) identifies critical issues for the implementation of engineering productivity measurement; (2) develops an Engineering Productivity Measurement System (EPMS) based on real project data; and, finally (3) recommends a framework for future studies.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Gibson Jr., G E |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | continuous improvement; measurement; benchmarking; offshore engineering; productivity; project cost; project performance |
| Index terms: | benchmarking, schedule performance, offshore engineering, project data, project cost, project performance, implementation, determinant, construction productivity, future study, critical issue, productivity, continuous improvement |
| Subjects: | research design and methodology, data collection methods, risk assessment, contractual arrangements, operations management, project management theory and practice, economics, management, performance measurement, infrastructure and transport systems, project controls |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Risk Management, Time Control, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here