Korkmaz, S (2007) Piloting evaluation metrics for high performance green building project delivery. PhD thesis, Pennsylvania State University, USA.
Abstract
High-performance green (HPG) buildings are becoming more widely adopted due to their potential to reduce energy costs, and to improve the health and productivity of occupants; creating an expectation of $10-20 billion value of green building construction starts by 2010, reported by Mc-Graw Hill. The emphasis on energy and indoor air quality aspects of high-performance green buildings leads to a need for superior planning, design and construction processes to achieve high-performance green goals within realistic financial and time constraints. The current literature offers product based high-performance metrics as a part of existing building assessment systems (e.g. LEED™ and Green Globes™) as well as metrics to study actual building performance, but lacks descriptive project delivery evaluation metrics. This gap in the literature inhibits project teams to fulfill the desired project goals and results with missed opportunities in the delivery process and shortcomings in the project performance outcomes. The limited green building population and the lack of knowledge about important project delivery evaluation metrics and methods to collect data in this field present the first challenge in HPG building project delivery research. Acknowledging these limitations, the purpose of this research is to advance the knowledge needed to deliver HPG buildings by piloting evaluation metrics for HPG building delivery. The research is exploratory in nature that aims to provide a foundation for future research by defining meaningful evaluation metrics, methods and tools to collect and analyze HPG building project delivery data. A mixed method is utilized to achieve these aims that start with a quantitative analysis examining a pool of HPG project delivery data collectively and than continues with a qualitative analysis to support the findings of quantitative analysis and draw additional lessons from case studies. The results lay a foundation for rigorous and high yield HPG building project delivery research and form a guide for the green building community to better deliver high-performance green building projects.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | population; indoor air quality; air quality; building performance; project delivery; productivity; project performance; qualitative analysis; quantitative analysis; case study; project team; green building |
| Index terms: | population, indoor air quality, qualitative analysis, green building, quantitative analysis, performance metric, building assessment, energy cost, building performance, air quality, project performance, design and construction, project team, project delivery, mixed method, becoming, case study, productivity |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, research design and methodology, climate science, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements, project delivery, management, design practice, performance measurement, project management theory and practice, demography, asset management, philosophical process, cost management, quality assurance, environmental health |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Design Practice, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Quality Management, Project Management, Sustainability, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here