Analysing talk-in-interaction between architects and users

Luck, R (2007) Analysing talk-in-interaction between architects and users. PhD thesis, University of Reading, UK.

Abstract

The activity of design is a common work activity for an architect, yet to date has received less attention in architectural studies of practice. This thesis in part attends to this knowledge gap by studying the activity of design in the everyday setting of the conversations between architects and users during early project stages. The research adopts a particular theoretical and associated methodological position from the social sciences: symbolic interactionism, ethnomethodology and applied conversation analysis. However, the thesis may be of more general interest to those studying the activity of design, collaborative design and spoken interaction in design meetings at early construction project stages. I empirically ground the activity of designing in the talk between architects and users and observe a range of actions of designing that are produced within the patterns of ordinary conversation. I consider the social construction of aspects of an architect's identity in interaction with users and observe some conversational practices that are used to 'work at' engaging users in the activity of designing. Comparatively aspects of an architect's expertise are examined in the talk at the outset of user consultation events. I examine the production of an 'institutional' setting for the interactions between architects and users and consider the structural production of turn-taking systems in talk. Characteristics of 'ordinary' talk were observed as well as interaction indicative of asymmetrical social relations. I highlight the interactions between architects and users as a yet to be named, less acknowledged aspect of architectural practice. Although user consultation exercises are increasingly part of construction projects, the implications of these interactions are yet to be appreciated as an integral part of a broader design process.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Hughes, W
Uncontrolled Keywords: social science; construction project; collaborative design; architect; symbolic interactionism; ethnomethodology; applied conversation analysis; social construction
Index terms: exercise, applied conversation analysis, architect, identity, social science, architectural practice, social construction, ethnomethodology, interaction, design process, construction project, symbolic interactionism, collaborative design
Subjects: behavioral psychology, sociology, production management, social theory, research methods, theoretical framing, health behaviours and lifestyles, design methods, business, profession
Topics: Health and Safety, Project Management, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here