Oo, B L (2007) Modelling individual contractors' bidding decisions in different competitive environments. PhD thesis, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
Abstract
Contractor's bidding decisions are dependent on individual firm-specific characteristics. This research is based on the premise that there is heterogeneity in the population of contractors, i.e. that individual contractors exhibit different bidding behaviour when confronted with a given set of bidding variables. The aim of this thesis is to demonstrate through statistical modelling that, in terms of decision to bid (d2b) and mark-up decisions, individual Hong Kong and Singapore contractors are influenced, to varying degrees, by (1) market conditions, (2) number of bidders, (3) project type and (4) project size; and that heterogeneity exists both at macro- (i.e. contractors operating within different competitive environments) and micro-levels (i.e. contractors operating within the same competitive environment). Data were gathered using a designed bidding experiment. This approach allows for a greater control over the manipulation of the bidding variables than would have been gained using real data, and in doing so make more direct comparisons between the two competitive environments (i.e. Hong Kong and Singapore) possible. Individual-specific parameter estimates that relate the bidding variables to individual contractors' d2b and mark-up decisions were obtained using the random-coefficients logistic model and linear mixed-model, respectively. The results show that not only there is significant heterogeneity between the Hong Kong and Singapore contractors in teens of both their preferences (intercepts) and responses (slopes) to the bidding variables that affect their d2b and mark-up decisions, but also that the individual Hong Kong and Singapore contractors have different degrees of sensitivity towards the bidding variables (which is reflected in the varying individual-specific intercepts and slopes). Allowing for the heterogeneities, (i) all Hong Kong contractors' d2b decision was found to be significantly affected by market conditions with significance of the other three bidding variables varying across the HK contractors, whereas all four bidding variables are significant for Singapore contractors; and (ii) both Hong Kong and Singapore contractors' mark-up decision is significantly affected by market conditions, number of bidders and project size but not project type. As such, the results indicate that market conditions was the only significant bidding variable affecting contractors' d2b and mark-up decisions in both competitive environments.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Drew, D and Lo, H-P |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | market; market conditions; population; slopes; bidding; Hong Kong; Singapore; experiment; market condition |
| Index terms: | estimate, modelling, Singapore, Hong Kong, statistical modelling, population, decision to bid, bidding, preference, mark-up, number of bidders, slope, experiment, market condition |
| Subjects: | analytical methods, financial and cost management, bidding, economic and policy analysis, data collection methods, statistical analysis, price determination, geotechnical engineering, demography, Geography, decision-making and reasoning |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Urban Studies, Cost Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here