Wong, K W J (2007) Development of selection evaluation and system intelligence analytic models for the intelligent building control systems. PhD thesis, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
Abstract
With the availability of innumerable 'intelligent' building products and the dearth of inclusive evaluation tools, design teams are confronted with the quandary of choosing the apposite building control systems to suit the needs of a particular intelligent building project. The paucity of measures that represent the degree of system intelligence and indicate the desirable goal in intelligent building control systems design further inhibits the consumers from comparing numerous products from the viewpoint of intelligence . This thesis is organised respectively to develop models for facilitating the selection evaluation and the system intelligence analysis for the seven predominant building control systems in the intelligent building. To achieve these objectives, systematic research activities are conducted to first develop, test and refine the general conceptual models using consecutive surveys; then, to convert the developed conceptual frameworks to the practical models; and, finally, to evaluate the effectiveness of the practical models by means of expert validations. The findings of this study, on one hand, suggest that there are different sets of critical selection criteria (CSC) affecting the selection decision of the intelligent building control systems. Service life, and operating and maintenance costs are perceived as two common CSC. The survey results generally reflect that an 'intelligent' building control system does not necessarily need to be technologically advanced. Instead, it should be the one that can ensure efficiency and enhance user comfort and cost effectiveness. On the other hand, the findings of the research on system intelligence suggest that each building control system has a distinctive set of intelligence attributes and indicators. The research findings also indicate that operational benefits of the intelligent building exert a considerable degree of influence on the relative importance of intelligence indicators of the building control systems in the models. This research not only presents a systematic and structured approach to evaluate candidate building control systems against the CSC, but it also suggests a benchmark to measure the degree of intelligence of one control system candidate against another.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Li, H |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | control system; effectiveness; efficiency; selection criteria; service life |
| Index terms: | survey, design team, intelligent building, relative importance, cost-effectivenes, building control, conceptual framework, control system, validation, efficiency, service life, maintenance cost, selection criteria, evaluation tool, effectiveness, comfort |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, risk assessment, professional practice, monitoring and control, health safety and environment, professional development, financial management, theoretical framing, design practice, tendering, economics, performance management, occupational health and safety management, asset management |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Information Management, Design Practice, Risk Management, Procurement, Health and Safety, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here