Ahmad, A H (2008) Private housing development: refining rational choice. PhD thesis, University College London, UK.
Abstract
Housing, as the principal focus of personal and family life, has a pervasive impact on all aspects of our existence, providing privacy and security, both physical and emotional, while embodying not only our material possessions, but also our dreams and despair. For most households in developing countries, financing housing constitutes a substantial proportion of household expenditure. Most research on housing finance focuses on measures of affordability and establishment of formal institutions. Others restrict their field of inquiry to the implementation of micro-credit facilities for incremental housing by lower income groups. Due to successive failures of public housing in many developing countries, strategies advocated by the global community tend towards diverting State involvement from provision to facilitation effective regulatory mechanisms deemed essential to enable private enterprise and informal practices in housing provision. Maldives experienced rapid economic growth during the last decades propelled by the expansion of tourism Yet, economic and social disparities between the capital, Male, and other islands continue to exist Consequently, in-migration to Male has fuelled an insatiable demand for housing. In the absence of formal housing finance, plot-holders in Male cannot construct multi storey housing that optimised land scarcity. This research focuses on the process by which private developers rent land from plot-holders to construct multi-storey rental housing, resulting in: income and shelter security for plot-holders increase in housing stock of Male and accumulation of capital for developers, with minimal State involvement or institutional support. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected from renters, plot-holders and developers through purposive sampling. Based on the ideological perspective of rational choice theory, grounded theory methodology was utilised to develop a substantive theory on housing finance that. in situations of absolute scarcity of land, and low levels of institutional support, the decisions of private developers in the process of multi-storey rental housing production appear within the paradigm of rational utility maximisation. However, deeper analyses of their motives reveal elements of altruism, benevolence and charity dominating their decisions within the socio-cultural milieu of Male where kith and kin relationships influence investment decisions.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | developer; developing countries; grounded theory; economic growth; investment; Maldives; migration; multi-storey; privacy; security |
| Index terms: | housing development, migration, maximization, Maldives, paradigm, privacy, altruism, disparity, purposive sampling, affordability, methodology, tourism, financing, income, investment decision, housing, public housing, land, developing country, economic growth, private enterprise, low level, housing stock, implementation, strategy, housing provision, motive, household, grounded theory |
| Subjects: | theoretical framing, organization, professional ethics, real estate economics, development economics, education and knowledge transfer, management, contractual arrangements, housing and residential development, social justice, psychology, construction type, industry analysis, research methods, economic analysis, Geography, economic development, sociology, measurement and scaling, algorithms, demography |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Human Resources, Digital Applications, Business Strategy, Legal Issues, Research Practice, Sustainability, Urban Studies, International Construction, Procurement, Ethics, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here