Handling future uncertainty: Strategic planning for the infrastructure sector

Dominguez, D (2008) Handling future uncertainty: Strategic planning for the infrastructure sector. DSc thesis, ETH Zürich, Switzerland.

Abstract

The technical components of infrastructure systems are planned and designed to operate over time periods of 25 to 40 years. However, the context conditions under which an infrastructure organization operates can change drastically and unpredictably over this extended time frame, due, for example, to population developments, new regulations or emerging technologies. Several studies on the future of infrastructure sectors have recently raised doubts regarding the capacity of the public sector to adequately address this future uncertainty and secure the delivery of infrastructure services. Prominently, private sector participation has been proposed as an option to address this capability gap. This thesis argues that public utility organizations can identify suitable alternatives to close this capability gap and thus improve their handling of future uncertainty by applying adequate management principles, such as formal strategic planning. Privatization is therefore not a necessary precondition for ensuring the long term delivery of utility services. This however requires an adaptation of existing strategic planning approaches to the particularities of the infrastructure sector, primarily 1) the high degree of path dependencies constraining the set of viable alternatives 2) the long planning horizons (and the related future uncertainty) and 3) the variety of environmental, social, economic and governance objectives imposed on the sector. To test this hypothesis, existing strategic planning approaches in the infrastructure sector were analyzed and a series of requirements for a strategic planning, suitable for the infrastructure sector, were developed. Based on this analysis, a strategic planning approach which complements the existing methodologies was developed and applied in three representative case studies in the Swiss wastewater sector. This approach builds on methods such as scenario planning and focuses on a structured debate, where possible future developments, available alternatives, and pursued objectives are explicitly addressed and evaluated from different perspectives. The application of the strategic planning approach shows that, given adequate tools, public utility organizations can overcome their limitations in identifying capability deficits regarding future challenges and assess adequate strategies to address these deficits. In addition, the strategic planning process stimulates a learning process within the organization. However, the selected strategies depend on value judgments and the existing organizational forms prevalent in the respective regions. This result suggests that an increasing diversity of organizational forms, i.e. ones which integrate various elements of private or public organizations, is likely to develop over the coming years.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: population; private sector; uncertainty; governance; learning; participation; privatization; public sector; scenario planning; strategic planning; case study; regulation
Index terms: option, privatization, emerging technology, strategic planning, adaptation, scenario planning, public sector, private sector, case study, judgment, governance, infrastructure sector, regulation, path dependency, methodology, population, public utility, private sector participation, strategy
Subjects: dispute resolution, strategic management, data collection methods, user focus, business, innovation and technology management, economic analysis, stakeholder participation, management, research methods, infrastructure and transport systems, industry analysis, administrative law, political science, demography, decision analysis
Topics: Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Governance, Stakeholder Management, Legal Issues, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here