Interorganizational collaboration: Transformation strategies to reduce construction disputes in the construction industry

Elmarsafi, G M (2008) Interorganizational collaboration: Transformation strategies to reduce construction disputes in the construction industry. PhD thesis, Capella University, USA.

Abstract

The purpose of this descriptive study, using a Delphi pilot and survey design was to investigate causes of construction project disputes, discover interorganizational processes and transformation strategies that could be implemented to decrease construction project disputes. The justification for conducting the study was that there are few current efforts on the part of construction industry stakeholders to solve the dispute problem affecting all stakeholders. The results of the research, shed light on the perspectives and experience of one construction project stakeholder group; engineers. The major findings of this study conducted with construction industry engineers are: (1) the most frequent and most damaging problems occurring in construction projects are caused by deficits in basic management functions; (2) contractors must improve managerial acumen and leadership effectiveness; (3) new business models must be devised that facilitate new types of stakeholder relationships; and (4) improved processes and technologies must be incorporated in the execution of construction projects. The dissertation provides some recommendations based on the findings.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Hargiss, K
Uncontrolled Keywords: collaboration; interorganization collaboration; effectiveness; construction project; business model; disputes; leadership; project stakeholder
Index terms: interorganizational, dispute, engineer, transformation, effectiveness, business model, dissertation, construction industry, construction dispute, strategy, survey, construction project, collaboration, project stakeholder
Subjects: production management, performance management, management, industry analysis, sociology, dispute resolution, business, research dissemination and communication, data collection methods, profession
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Project Management, Legal Issues, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here