A framework for the pre-construction evaluation of sustainable housing projects in the UK

Essa, R A (2008) A framework for the pre-construction evaluation of sustainable housing projects in the UK. PhD thesis, Heriot-Watt University, UK.

Abstract

Considering sustainability during the cost estimating process is vital for the successful integration of sustainable features within a construction project. The UK Government has adopted the principles of sustainable development, and social housing projects now have to achieve the EcoHomes 'very good' rating as a prerequisite to Government grants funding. A gap was identified in the literature reviewed between policy and practice in the delivery of sustainable social housing projects. This gap revealed differing ways in which sustainable factors are prioritised by practitioners at the early stage of the project price forecasting processes. As a result it was resolved to develop an aid for practitioners to use when involved m the early stage evaluation of sustainable social housing projects.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Carter, K and Kaka, A
Uncontrolled Keywords: cost estimating; forecasting; funding; government; housing projects; integration; policy; sustainable development; UK
Index terms: sustainable housing, cost estimating, forecasting, funding, sustainable development, housing project, construction project, practitioner, social housing, integration, pre-construction
Subjects: economic analysis, prediction and forecasting, financial and cost management, health safety and environment, production management, project delivery, organizational analysis, practitioner, housing and residential development
Topics: Roles and Professions, Urban Studies, Project Management, Cost Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here