Hallowell, M R (2008) A formal model for construction safety and health risk management. PhD thesis, Oregon State University, USA.
Abstract
Despite recent efforts to improve site safety, construction still accounts for a disproportionate injury and illness rate. According to the 2007 injury and illness data released by the National Safety Council, the construction industry has a fatality and disabling injury rate that is approximately three times higher than the all-industry average. The transient, unique, and complex nature of construction projects makes safety management exceptionally difficult. Most construction safety efforts are applied in an informal fashion under the premise that simply allocating more resources to safety management will improve site safety. Currently, there is no mechanism by which construction site safety professionals may formally select safety program elements for a particular process. This dissertation describes a research effort that introduces, populates, and validates a formal method to evaluate construction safety risk and strategically match safety program elements to construction processes. The decision scheme introduced, based on the application of Newton’s third law, assumes that every construction activity is associated with specific safety risks and that each safety program element is capable of mitigating a portion of such risks. Using the high-risk process of constructing concrete formwork as an example, the theoretical model was populated. Data was obtained using the Delphi method, a systematic and interactive research technique for obtaining the judgment of a panel of independent experts. The results of this research include the quantification of probability and severity values for ten mutually-exclusive and all-inclusive safety risks associated with thirteen worker-activities required to construct concrete formwork. Additionally, the study quantified the probability and severity reduction values resulting from the implementation of thirteen safety program elements. The data can be used to improve safety management techniques in several ways. First, cumulative risk may be tracked throughout a work period allowing safety managers to identify and avoid periods of exceptionally high safety risk. Second, safety managers may strategically select safety program elements based on the ability to reduce portions of specific risks. Finally, the balance between cumulative risk and the safety mitigation can be evaluated. The results of this research indicate that the highest risk activities for formwork construction are form lubrication and preparation, ascending and descending ladders, and accepting and loading materials with a crane. The most effective safety program elements are upper management support and commitment, subcontractor selection and management, and employee involvement in safety management and planning. The risk values for formwork construction and the risk reduction values associated with safety program elements can be used to determine the appropriate scope and focus of safety and health management efforts. The methods used to quantify these values may be applied to any construction process or safety program.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction activity; concrete formwork; construction safety; construction site; formwork; injury; employee involvement; risk management; safety; employee; subcontractor; probability; quantification; construction project; professional |
| Index terms: | dissertation, loading, implementation, construction industry, construction safety and health, risk management, formwork, construction activity, illness, employee involvement, quantification, Delphi method, judgment, construction safety, safety management, subcontractor, concrete formwork, lubrication, subcontractor selection, construction project, program, construction process, mitigation, construction site, commitment, manager, risk reduction, injury |
| Subjects: | dispute resolution, practitioner, risk assessment, data collection methods, research dissemination and communication, organization, construction operations, contractual arrangements, construction methods, psychology, work location, production management, financial risk, manufacturing engineering, software systems, industry analysis, environmental health, occupational health and safety management, measurement and scaling, health conditions and diseases, building construction |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Cost Management, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Human Resources, Digital Applications, Site Management, Organizational Design, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Procurement, Sustainability, Risk Management, Supply Chain Management, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here