Developing a model for vision-based progress measurement and visualisation of as-built construction operations

Ibrahim, Y M (2008) Developing a model for vision-based progress measurement and visualisation of as-built construction operations. PhD thesis, Heriot-Watt University, UK.

Abstract

Traditional ways of capturing the progress of work on construction sites rely on manual means. This often involves subjectivity and is therefore prone to error. In addition, the timing of this manual approach is usually too infrequent to allow for prompt control actions. This study is about automating the process of measuring work in progress and integrating that with design, planning, and as-built documentation of progress information. The work reported in this study is a subset of an EPSRC funded project that aims to investigate applications of computer vision techniques to the measurement of work in progress. The key issues addressed are the conceptual design of the entire system and the computer implementation of a model for documenting as-built pro information.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Kaka, A
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction site; documentation; subjectivity; measurement; monitoring
Index terms: construction operation, subjectivity, visualization, conceptual design, progress measurement, implementation, computer vision, construction site, documentation, monitoring
Subjects: computer vision, professional development, contractual arrangements, control systems, design practice, project controls, human factors and perception, construction operations, work location
Topics: Information Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Procurement, Site Management, Research Practice, Time Control
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here